Religious Scholarship & Literacy
Religious Scholarship & Literacy
  • 90
  • 52 939
The Ancient Near Eastern Cultural Context for the Israelite Temple Cult
Presentation given to the Los Alamos Faith and Science Forum, June 11, 2024.
The Israelite temple tradition was recorded in painstaking detail. It included specific architectural forms, enigmatic cultic objects, and complex rituals. To the modern reader, this can be one of the most jarring and sometimes confusing aspects of the Biblical text. But to its ancient authors and audience, these aspects would have felt very familiar.
Israelite culture did not appear in a vacuum. They were surrounded by larger and older civilizations including Mesopotamia to the east, the Hittites to the North, and the Egyptians to the South. And they were directly imbedded within the culture of the older culture of the Canaanites. All of these societies worshiped in temples, and the forms of their temple worship are very similar to what we find in Ancient Israel.
Therefore, whether we believe that ancient Israelite religion was a natural evolution from these earlier beliefs, or whether we believe it was revealed to them by God, it is essential to understand the temple traditions that surrounded the Israelites, in order to understand what message Israelite temple worship was intended to convey to the people of the time.
We will survey some of these related traditions, their temples, texts, and traditions. Of particular note will be the Daily Temple liturgy from Karnack, Iron age Syrian temples of Tell Tayinat and Ain Dara, as well as the excavation of Israelite temples at Tell es-Seba, Lachish, and Arad.
We will explore their implications for the appearance, significance, and meaning of Israelite temple worship.
Course web pages for Biblical Scholarship and Literacy, as well as for Comparative Religion are available online at the following links:
sites.google.com/view/comparativereligion/home/
Переглядів: 331

Відео

Comparative Religion: Taoism, the Way of Flow
Переглядів 5932 місяці тому
This month's Adult RE class was held at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos on Sunday, May 26, 2024. The topic is Taoism, the Way of Flow. In this lecture we discuss Taoism (or Daoism) in contrast to Confucianism which we covered last month. While Confucians say that to be a whole and complete human, we should become a rú or scholar, through education, Taoists say that we have to unlearn all the...
Comparative Religion: An Introduction to Confucianism
Переглядів 1283 місяці тому
This month's Adult RE class was held at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos on Sunday, April 21, 2024. The topic is Confucianism, Society, Community, and Ritual in China "Religion" as a distinct category is a western concept, and Confucianism challenges our definitions, in that it is difficult for us to determine if it is a religion, or just a political philosophy. Confucius lived in a time when...
Comparative Religion: Chinese Folk Religion and the Imperial Cult
Переглядів 814 місяці тому
This month's Adult RE class was held at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos on Sunday, March 24th, 2024. The topic is Chinese folk religion, and the Imperial Cult. We discussed Chinese concepts of harmony and balance, the agrarian origins of Chinese religion, yin and yang, qi (chi), the dao (tao), wuxing (the five elements), supernatural beings such as gods, spirits, and hungry ghosts, ancestor ...
Comparative Religion: Atheism Part 2, Morality, Meaning, and Truth
Переглядів 1025 місяців тому
This month's Adult RE class was held at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos on Sunday, January 28th, 2024. In part one we discussed information from survey questions that showed that Atheists skew male, educated, rich, white, and highly stigmatized. (See ua-cam.com/video/U-8rOXu3U_I/v-deo.html ) This month we will continue our discussion of Atheism from the perspective of comparative religion. I...
Comparative Religion: Atheism Part 1, Demography and Destiny
Переглядів 1379 місяців тому
This month's Adult RE class was held at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos on Sunday, October 22, 2023. This month we will cover the topic of Atheism, from the perspective of comparative religion. Whether Atheism should be considered a religion is a contentious topic that largely depends on your definition of a religion (which is also a difficult subject). Presumably, "if Atheism is a religion,...
Biblical S&L 30: Conclusion to the Book of Deuteronomy and the Pentateuch
Переглядів 7610 місяців тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, August 28, 2023 at 11:45am at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos, Adult Religious Education Program. The fifth and final book of the Pentateuch or "Law of Moses" is The Book of Deuteronomy. In this lecture we conclude our study of the book of Deuteronomy, and of the Law of Moses. Last time we introduced the D source. This ti...
Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Science, Peril, and Promise Los Alamos Faith and Science Forum
Переглядів 9411 місяців тому
A presentation given to the Los Alamos Faith and Science Forum, July 25th, 2023 at the SALA Event Center. ua-cam.com/video/pH0_ECANvXI/v-deo.html the previous AI lecture which focused more on the history of AI, while this presentation focused on more philosophical questions, such as can artificial intelligent computers be intelligent, think, learn, understand, or be conscious, as well as a disc...
Biblical S&L 29: Introduction to the Book of Deuteronomy
Переглядів 88Рік тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 11:45am at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos, Adult Religious Education Program. The fifth and final book of the Pentateuch or "Law of Moses" is The Book of Deuteronomy. We will introduce both the Book itself, as well as the author/source D, the last of the four main sources proposed by The Documentary Hypo...
Biblical S&L 28: Water from the Stone, the Brazen Serpent (Exodus 17, Numbers 20,21, 2 Kings 18)
Переглядів 70Рік тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 11:45am at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos, Adult Religious Education Program. This lecture is the conclusion to the Biblical Book of Numbers. Today we covered: The Pattern of Complaint and Intercession found throughout the Pentateuch. This pattern can be summarized in the following steps: * People complai...
An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (UULA Forum)
Переглядів 280Рік тому
Forum delivered at the Unitarian Church of Los Alamos, 4/9/2023, An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Given recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), this topic has become increasingly important. We cover the history of AI, from its optimistic inception, through the "AI Winter", the gradual recovery, and the modern breakthroughs. We talk about AI Music, Art, and text/chat, describ...
Biblical S&L 27: Balaam the Pagan Prophet And his Talking Donkey, (Numbers 22-31)
Переглядів 79Рік тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, March 26, 2023 at 11:45am. Today we discuss the story of the Pagan Prophet Balaam and his talking donkey. We read the story, discuss issues of authorship, and then discuss the Deir Alla Inscription, a very early text that also mentions Balaam the son of Beor. I must admit that I find this particular Bible story fascinating. ...
Biblical S&L 26: Introduction to Numbers, What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say About Abortion
Переглядів 37Рік тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, February 27, 2023 at 11:45am. In this lecture we introduce the Book of Numbers, discuss the origins of the name of the book, and its authorship/dating. We give several different methods for outlining/organizing the contents of numbers, and then we discuss the priestly purity laws found in Numbers 1-10:10 in greater detail. T...
Biblical S&L 25: The Holiness Code, Leviticus 17-27, and Contradictions in the Law
Переглядів 96Рік тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:45am. We continue the discussion of Leviticus with a discussion of the Holiness Code. We review the Documentary Hypothesis, then discuss why the Holiness code is generally considered to come from a different source (the H Source) than the rest of the book of Leviticus (the P Source). We discuss 4 reaso...
Biblical S&L 24: The Day of Atonement, (Leviticus 14, 16)
Переглядів 84Рік тому
Recording of the Biblical Scholarship and Literacy class given Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 11:45am. We continue our study of the Book of Leviticus with a discussion of the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) festival and ritual. Leviticus 1-16 comes from the P source or tradition, and contains instruction to the priests. The Day of Atonement is the culmination of those instructions. The Day of Atone...
Biblical S&L 23: Introduction to Leviticus, (Leviticus 1-15)
Переглядів 173Рік тому
Biblical S&L 23: Introduction to Leviticus, (Leviticus 1-15)
Biblical S&L 22: The Golden Calf, (Exodus 32-34)
Переглядів 71Рік тому
Biblical S&L 22: The Golden Calf, (Exodus 32-34)
Biblical S&L 21: The Tabernacle of Moses, Exodus 25-31, 35-40
Переглядів 1482 роки тому
Biblical S&L 21: The Tabernacle of Moses, Exodus 25-31, 35-40
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 7: Vajrayana Buddhism
Переглядів 4464 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 7: Vajrayana Buddhism
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 6: Mahayana Buddhism
Переглядів 6344 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 6: Mahayana Buddhism
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 20: The Decalogue and the Book of the Covenant, Exodus 19-24
Переглядів 1244 роки тому
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 20: The Decalogue and the Book of the Covenant, Exodus 19-24
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 19: Exodus and the Question of Historicity
Переглядів 1384 роки тому
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 19: Exodus and the Question of Historicity
UULA Adult RE: Religious Studies Part 3: The Secularization Hypothesis and the Future of Religion
Переглядів 5954 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Religious Studies Part 3: The Secularization Hypothesis and the Future of Religion
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 5, Buddhism After the Buddha
Переглядів 2104 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 5, Buddhism After the Buddha
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 18: The Passage to Sinai, Exodus 14-18
Переглядів 494 роки тому
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 18: The Passage to Sinai, Exodus 14-18
UULA Adult RE: Mormonism, Lecture 6: The Future of Mormonism, Statistics, Demographics, and Trends
Переглядів 1,1 тис.4 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Mormonism, Lecture 6: The Future of Mormonism, Statistics, Demographics, and Trends
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 17: The Passover and the Parting of the Red Sea
Переглядів 494 роки тому
UULA Adult RE, BS&L 17: The Passover and the Parting of the Red Sea
UULA Adult RE, BS&L Movie Night, The Prince Of Egypt
Переглядів 914 роки тому
UULA Adult RE, BS&L Movie Night, The Prince Of Egypt
UULA Adult RE: Mormonism, Lecture 5, The Believer's Perspective, Guest Speaker, LDS Bishop Scott
Переглядів 1074 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Mormonism, Lecture 5, The Believer's Perspective, Guest Speaker, LDS Bishop Scott
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 4, Mindfulness and Meditation 101
Переглядів 1864 роки тому
UULA Adult RE: Buddhism Part 4, Mindfulness and Meditation 101

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @davidjohnzenocollins
    @davidjohnzenocollins Місяць тому

    You people must be in the top quintile of income distribution. That's why you don't get it: unlike your "fellow" Americans, you aren't feeling the sheer desperation that comes from gross inequality. One example: medical bills are the number one reason for bankruptcy.

  • @davidjohnzenocollins
    @davidjohnzenocollins Місяць тому

    Goodness gracious! Part One, and now Part Two, are making me want to read Sean Carroll's book, The Big Picture.

  • @Azupiru
    @Azupiru Місяць тому

    He didn't show them the pillar capitals or the Magdala Stone?

  • @MothachadhNadurrach
    @MothachadhNadurrach Місяць тому

    Thank you for a very neat presentation, halfway through you gained a new subscriber :-) 46:00 The eastern mindset is somewhat different from our western one. The view of technological development vs. nature is more our western way of thinking. One doesn't need to reject one to follow the other - human development is a part of the nature. Confucianism and Taoism aren't opposites, but complementary to each other. Your "real human wisdom is knowing when each one is required" hits the nail square in the head. Very glad this came up for me, I'm excited to start the playlist from the top!

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Місяць тому

      Thank you! Welcome!

  • @935AscensionGroup
    @935AscensionGroup Місяць тому

    Hey, great video! Is there a reason why Islam is omitted in the table around 2:50? Would like to know what their stance is on problem/solution/Techniques

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Місяць тому

      I usually summarize Islam by saying that the problem is pride, and therefore the solution is submission to God.

  • @ocholamwanafalsafa8627
    @ocholamwanafalsafa8627 Місяць тому

    Enjoyed the lecture,thanks❤

  • @kabroadb
    @kabroadb 2 місяці тому

    I really appreciate the detail you put into these presentations, how you compare them across the board is really helpful, thank you for your hard work!

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Місяць тому

      Thank you!

  • @ocholamwanafalsafa8627
    @ocholamwanafalsafa8627 2 місяці тому

    I enjoyed the lecture as someone who is really digging deep into religions. Thanks.

  • @ocholamwanafalsafa8627
    @ocholamwanafalsafa8627 2 місяці тому

    Enjoyed the lecture and actively consuming the next series,thanks.This is one of my areas of great interest as a Freethinker❤.

  • @capliced
    @capliced 3 місяці тому

    I'm so happy to see the recent uploads on religious studies again as each month they bring me a lot of joy and interest! Just one question, do you think you will ever do a lecture on Keiji Nishitani or the Kyoto school at large? Religion and Nothingness sets an amazing take on religion in my opinion and I would be interested in seeing you delve into it. Anyway, who ever you are, where ever you are in your lifes journey, whatever you believe, who ever you love, thank you ❤

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 2 місяці тому

      Thank you! I don't have a current plan to do a lecture on that. But I might look more into it in the future. I am so glad you are enjoying these.

  • @xcopex
    @xcopex 4 місяці тому

    I enjoy the comparative religion elements but I really wish this was more focused on the rituals and rites in Mesopotamia and in Babylonian culture. There's also not too much mention on comparative religion between Babylonian and Sumerian traditions even though they influenced each other.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 4 місяці тому

      Thank you for the feedback. I did this a long time ago, but I will try to add some of that material you requested if I ever revisit this topic. I mostly think of Babylonian culture and religion as a continuation and evolution of earlier Sumerian and Akkadian culture.

  • @bartonbagnes4605
    @bartonbagnes4605 5 місяців тому

    Joseph Smith Jr. didn't say "Adam fell that men might be, and men are that they might have joy.", that was Alma. Joseph Smith Jr. didn't know Hebrew or Egyptian or Mayan, he couldn't have written The Book Of Mormon. Everyone alive in his day working together couldn't have written The Book Of Mormon. A lot of the things mentioned in The Book Of Mormon weren't historically or archeologically verified until long after The Book Of Mormon was published, and more things are being discovered that supports The Book Of Mormon all the time. Like the Characters Document being shown to contain Hieratic and Demotic Egyptian characters and also Mayan characters, and when translated, actually give names and dates from The Book Of Mormon, though some of the dates are not in The Book Of Mormon, though they line up with events that are, so they must have been in the lost pages.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 5 місяців тому

      Thank you for your views. Clearly I disagree about who the author of the Book of Mormon was. But you are most welcome to your opinion and your faith, and I thank you for watching! Incidentally, I can read Egyptian and Demotic. And as far as I can tell none of the characters are actually Egyptian or Demotic, and none contain dates from the Book of Mormon. Further, I am not aware of any reputable LDS scholar of Egyptology such as Michael Rhodes or John Gee who agrees with your claims here regarding the Book of Mormon characters.

    • @bartonbagnes4605
      @bartonbagnes4605 5 місяців тому

      @@jlc46 Authors, they have identified four different authors through text analysis, none of which match the writing style of Joseph Smith Jr. or any of his associates. Gerry sights every Egyptian and Mayan dictionary where each character is found, and the definitions assigned by expert Egyptologists or expert Mayanologists to each character. That any of them line up by chance, shouldn't be possible, let alone that so many do. So you aren't just casting aspersions on Gerry, but all Egyptologists and Mayanologists.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 5 місяців тому

      @@bartonbagnes4605: I am familiar with the word print analysis studies. There are actually several different ones that have been done, and they are inconclusive, in that they disagree with each other, depending on how one sets up the model. I have studied this issue thoroughly, and was involved with FARMS publishing supposed Book of Mormon evidences for years. The evidence is beyond conclusive that the Book of Mormon is a 19th century text, and that Joseph Smith is the primary author. This is not the right place to debate Book of Mormon Authorship claims in detail. But I would be happy to have that debate with you in another venue sometime.

    • @bartonbagnes4605
      @bartonbagnes4605 5 місяців тому

      @@jlc46 So how did Joseph Smith Jr. come up with Social Darwinism and a religious reason against it in what could only have been a matter of minutes at most? Alma 30: 17. All before Darwin even planned to sail on the H.M.S. Beagle, let alone wrote On The Origin Of Species. That may still be 19th century, but very late 19th century, long after Joseph Smith Jr.'s death. Yet it is relevant for today, with so many people using animal instincts as an excuse to do horrible things.

  • @lisabc99
    @lisabc99 7 місяців тому

    Will you do a part 2?

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 6 місяців тому

      Yes, this coming Sunday at 11:45. At the UU Church.

  • @user-bg4rb5dc3w
    @user-bg4rb5dc3w 7 місяців тому

    hey James, i’m a online viewer from across the pond.. will you ever do something on islam? i feel like there is a lack of good material on youtube

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 6 місяців тому

      I did a series on Islam a long time ago. It wouldn't hurt to revisit that. I'm not sure there is a recording of it on UA-cam at the moment.

    • @user-bg4rb5dc3w
      @user-bg4rb5dc3w 4 місяці тому

      @@jlc46on this channel there isn’t.. this may be alot to ask but if you have a link or something that would be awesome.. I love your lectures! I’m swiss and listen to them when work is tedious and I need to get through it.. thanks for everything you do!

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 4 місяці тому

      ​@@user-bg4rb5dc3wI recommend religion for breakfast, everything he does is excellent, and he does have a lecture on Islam: ua-cam.com/video/Qtz4NGzpOco/v-deo.html That may be a great place to start. My current release schedule is to do Chinese folk religion today, that will form the basis for future lectures on Confucianism, and Taoism, which will then allow a discussion of Zen Buddhism (and the larger discussion of how Buddhism interacts with existing Chinese beliefs as it moves into China). Islam will be next after that. Specifically because you asked for it, and that made me aware that this is an important bit I am missing!

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 4 місяці тому

      Also, I did give a lecture on Islam back in 2015, and there is a very poor audio recording but no video. However, I do have the slides! I have put both up on Google drive in case you are interested: Slides: docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kKrB0ZuBdNWpu0o828-ntwqZLE3c9Iu5e8B_O0tLAEE/edit#slide=id.p4 Audio: drive.google.com/file/d/1p8LMpQN4FflzvC5O06ZtfCgm4aMLs5_6/view?usp=drive_link

  • @user-bg4rb5dc3w
    @user-bg4rb5dc3w 9 місяців тому

    this is a treasure

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 6 місяців тому

      Thank you!

  • @jamescarroll8917
    @jamescarroll8917 11 місяців тому

    CORRECTION: I said that Jesus was paraphrasing Maimonides when he described the two most important commandments in the Law. But he is a later 12th century Rabbi. Looks like I was actually thinking of Hillel and Rabbi Akiva.

  • @lisaday-daniels5262
    @lisaday-daniels5262 Рік тому

    Hi Cous'! I haven't read Deuteronomy yet but I will. Is the King James version of the Bible okay to capture everything that's suppose to be there? You are an excellent speaker....my bias aside. I'm so proud of you and you are incredibly intelligent. Great Job!

    • @jamescarroll8917
      @jamescarroll8917 11 місяців тому

      I grew up reading the King James Version, but I definitely prefer the NRSV now.

  • @user-bg4rb5dc3w
    @user-bg4rb5dc3w Рік тому

    these lectures are amazing.. I’m suprised the views are so low

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      Thank you!

  • @sacredmetaphics
    @sacredmetaphics Рік тому

    I would have preferred if the subject matter resonated more with you . I do not like the word believe in a lecture you either know or don’t know if you can guess or fool yourself.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 5 місяців тому

      I believe that human beings have to make decisions in the presence of uncertainty all the time. We have no choice but to make the best guesses we can. Most of the time I think we fool ourselves when we think we "know" something with absolute certainty. I think it important for us all to hold room for "I think" or "I believe" but "I don't know for sure". I think that's a form of humility.

  • @beecee793
    @beecee793 Рік тому

    The title of this channel is the most oxymoronic title I have ever seen, lol. "Religious" with "Literacy" and "Scholarship" - lmfao! Adults who find it appropriate to believe in the supernatural unfortunately usually do not align with 2 of the 3 terms used in your title :p.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      From your comment, I don't think you have watched any of the religion videos on this channel. Religious "literacy" in this context means knowing what others believe. I don't promote religion, and am an agnostic. I promote knowing ABOUT religion. As sociologists say: "I don't teach religion, I teach ABOUT religion."

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      Incidentally, religious "literacy" in this context is a pretty good antidote to most forms of supernatural beliefs and religious dogmatism.

  • @jlc46
    @jlc46 Рік тому

    Link to the start of the discussion of Sexual Prescriptions and Abortion in the Old Testament: ua-cam.com/video/4S4rkBF2dSA/v-deo.html I should also add that one rather obvious interpretation of the "curse" in this section is that it originated from the symptoms of untreated STI's which were then mis-applied to a curse from the water.

  • @kgalalelolelo149
    @kgalalelolelo149 Рік тому

    Hi, I'm interested in scholarship I'm reasiding at East rand Tsakane, thank you so much.

  • @anthonynicoli
    @anthonynicoli Рік тому

    The problem with the readers digest article is that it mistakes these young women for virgins. ;-)

  • @Justin-yd7hh
    @Justin-yd7hh Рік тому

    🎊 𝖕𝖗𝖔𝖒𝖔𝖘𝖒

  • @hombrepobre9646
    @hombrepobre9646 Рік тому

    don't look at her mouth other wise the audio and the video don't fit with each other.

  • @marquise7200
    @marquise7200 Рік тому

    I think Hinduism is about choices so in a sense some souls must go down that route to understand why they shouldn’t. It’s like telling your child don’t touch the fire on the stove you will get burnt. Them the kids still does it cause they don’t understand completely till after the burn. I fully understand why you would break down how to do something wrong and say don’t do it.

  • @TetGallardoUU
    @TetGallardoUU 2 роки тому

    Buddhism is not a sect of Hinduism. Tantra is not about power but about energy. Muslims didn't pushout Buddhists to Tibet. That's an organic expansion. Next time, get a Buddhist.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      "Buddhism is not a sect of Hinduism" I think that depends on how you define "sect". Buddhism originated in a Hindu environment in the same way that Christianity originated in a Jewish environment. But you are correct that both have changed enough to be considered distinct. "Tantra is not about power but about energy." I'm not sure exactly what distinction you are attempting to make here. But many Buddhists have used the term "power" to describe this. "Muslims didn't pushout Buddhists to Tibet. That's an organic expansion." You are correct that there was an organic expansion. But it is also true that Islam seriously (and violently) undermined Buddhism in India. There is no either or here that I can see. "Next time, get a Buddhist." I am a Buddhist. :-D But even if I wasn't, I suspect that the Buddha would rejoice in others trying to understand and convey as much as they can about the history and Dharma, rather than criticizing imperfections in their knowledge and approach. I'm sure he would correct errors, but I suspect that he would do so with an attempt to add to understanding, rather than to shame imperfections. The goal is to remove suffering, not to become attached to our ideas and to create conflict thereby. If I have made mistakes in my understanding, I welcome correction.

  • @jackwilson9031
    @jackwilson9031 2 роки тому

    𝐩яⓞ𝓂𝓞Ş𝐦

  • @KizaWittaker
    @KizaWittaker 2 роки тому

    A point of critique on that article. Eliade points out the we still performed these rituals, even if they have lost their religious consciousness. But why is the football game so popular? It’s produces zero monetary value (unless you gamble), and yet it’s the one of the highest watched and sought out forms of action on the planet. Eliade says “Many psychologists say that the unconscious is religious, however in the modern time, religion has become unconscious”.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      Interesting thought. Thank you.

  • @jamesmorris9130
    @jamesmorris9130 2 роки тому

    Dude! Long time no see! Welcome back. Hope you and your church are well.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 2 роки тому

      Thank you! It's nice to be back!

    • @jamesmorris9130
      @jamesmorris9130 2 роки тому

      @@jlc46 I discovered your channel on UA-cam several years ago. I have a fascination with comparative religion and I've found it very interesting and informative.

  • @DrJavadTHashmi
    @DrJavadTHashmi 2 роки тому

    Hi there. I initially left an angry comment but deleted it, realizing that is not the proper way to dialogue and would also reinforce stereotypes that you unfortunately fell into here. Overall, this was a very good lecture, with which I only have minor quibbles... except for your comment about Islam being more prone to fundamentalism. This was a major doozie. It is unfortunate that someone from the UU community -- who believes in love and ecumenical openness -- would pass off such a lazy generalization based off of stereotyping. This is quite unfortunate. You are quite frankly incorrect in stating that the Quran itself states that it is the literal word of God nor does it actually make a difference to the imagined point you were making. The Islamic tradition has always acknowledged the plurality of interpretative possibilities; Thomas Bauer in his book "A Culture of Ambiguity" argues that the historical Islamic tradition in fact exhibited more flexibility in this regard than Christendom. Furthermore, there are/were multiple theories of prophecy/revelation, with the Islamic philosophers famously believing that the Prophet is inspired by God but then translates these into his own words. The view you expressed was simply the Hanbali view, which historically was a minority viewpoint. Yes, fundamentalism has surged in recent decades but this hardly encompasses all of Islamic history. Furthermore, the surge in fundamentalism is not unrelated to Western colonialism and continued military interventionism. Indeed, the connection between the two phenomena is very easy to show. Again, it's quite unfortunate that a learned gentleman like yourself would pass off such ignorant and Islamophobic comments. It is as if you are taking your knowledge from Jihad Watch's Robert Spencer. Incidentally, I debated him on almost the exact topic. You would benefit from watching the debate in order to learn about the long history of Christian militancy and violence, which is related to your claim about fundamentalism being more likely in one rather than the other religion: ua-cam.com/video/nLoGV8MdPY4/v-deo.html It would be worthwhile to consider that you are making the same point that a bigot like Spencer makes. I am more than happy to discuss this with you and your class. I am a PhD candidate in the Study of Religion at Harvard University.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 2 роки тому

      Thank you for your kind and thoughtful feedback.

    • @GrimSleepy
      @GrimSleepy Рік тому

      I have a hypothesis that the Abrahamic texts are highly linked to overland movement of and organization of ranks within militant groups. Particularly, the duties of the Levites during the events of the Hebrew exodus from Egypt. The chemistry behind brewing vinegar and wine for fighting infection and disease while traveling overland, lots of rules and rituals which defined procedures for maintaining rank and order of the camp. Could be my biased background from a military family, but I'm pretty sure I could provide a couple more examples pointing toward militia maintenance, ignoring the direct acts of warfare and combat referenced within the scriptures.

  • @armedjoy3045
    @armedjoy3045 2 роки тому

    Carl marx

  • @matthewfernandez1101
    @matthewfernandez1101 2 роки тому

    Hi

  • @jacobatienza7344
    @jacobatienza7344 2 роки тому

    The Idol section is very reminiscent of Julian Jaynes' concept of the bicameral mind, in relation to Babylonian idol worship.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      I don't know much about that. Can you tell me more?

  • @boson6336
    @boson6336 2 роки тому

    Is this what it’s like to read a Babylonian tablet? Amazing content with frustrating missing pieces :-)

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      Ya, sorry. I really want to go back and re-do a bunch of these old lectures.

  • @_esdrassantos
    @_esdrassantos 2 роки тому

    What if Nefertite was not the Akenaton's wife but daugther?

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 2 роки тому

      I'm not sure that I have heard that particular theory before. Why do you think that?

    • @_esdrassantos
      @_esdrassantos 2 роки тому

      @@jlc46 Hi, Mr. Carroll. I was wondering if it could be possible. I was imagine the number of enemies with new monotheistic religion created, and further more with creation of city of Amarna. What such impressive action in those times full of dogmas, superticions and a strong comerce and interests behind. To solve this unconvenient equation nothing more efective than have destructed the actions and personality of its master. All his images and cartuches was destroyed, artistic pannels removed. Why not his personal history too?

  • @nirbhaynandan72
    @nirbhaynandan72 2 роки тому

    this is what we call fucking colonial/western gaze....when it comes to christianity its full of hell history will vanish from discussion....the dark age of europe is bcz of christianity.

  • @allanochoa4826
    @allanochoa4826 2 роки тому

    why are these texts so difficult to read and understand. im so lost reading his work

  • @billscannell93
    @billscannell93 2 роки тому

    What a bunch of loony crap, though. It is hard for me to see it as anything other than a waste of a bright young intellect.

  • @billscannell93
    @billscannell93 2 роки тому

    It's funny how there seems to be more animosity between Evangelical Christians and Mormons than between atheists and either of those sects. Christians think Mormonism is some terrible satanic black magic and Mormons think they are the only true Christians. We atheists just think you are all nuts. Haha.

  • @lantzeerie2481
    @lantzeerie2481 2 роки тому

    fire does represent a state of matter though. Plasma.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      Good point!

  • @Veevslav1
    @Veevslav1 3 роки тому

    It is the nature of revelation that it becomes more refined the more we do something or try something. Sometimes we are also given the wrong answer to help us know we are on the right path and to give us peace from second guessing ourselves longer than necessary. So it ends up being the right answer. My wife and I bought a lot to build a house in one city. We felt right about it. Everything lined up so we could buy it. After we bought it we never felt like the lot was ours. AS we met with builders this only became more pronounced. We sold the lot a short time later and bought a HUD home in another city that we had to drop more money into than if we had built brand new. We are in a better place as far as location is concerned. If we had not bought the lot and met with the builders and purchased the lot we would have missed the home we bought.

  • @richardholmes7199
    @richardholmes7199 3 роки тому

    Google ''Book of Abraham pt 1 (Why Egyptologists are wrong) you tube''. A video debunking the Egyptologists by presenting proper interpretation. Proper interpretation is Joseph Smith translated in reverse back to a biblical text, the original.

  • @ChristopherSisk
    @ChristopherSisk 3 роки тому

    To be fair, Joseph Campbell did contribute quite a lot to the study of mythologies that far outweighs the hero's journey from only one of his books written specifically for the general public. His 4-volume Masks of God series alone goes into a much deeper exploration of the origins of the myths with ample citations and credit given to his academic peers. I feel, much like Carl Sagan, receiving negativity from other academics was just par for the course for scientific popularizers.

    • @jlc46
      @jlc46 Рік тому

      This is an interesting take. Thank you. I deeply appreciate the work Carl Sagan did for the presentation of scientific ideas to the general population. And despite what I said in this lecture, I did like the Hero's Journey. I just think that we have to be careful to not over-apply typologies. But they are still incredibly useful things.

  • @leosrule5691
    @leosrule5691 3 роки тому

    According to their bible, the Hebrews lived in Egypt (thanks to Joseph) for 400yrs PRIOR TO Moses & the Exodus (which - per their writing- was because they didnt want to pay taxes. They had been exempt for past 400yrs). AND - according to their own words - it took another 70yrs before Moses actually 'freed' them. Thus, if we are going to continually date texts to the Hebrew bible, then it IS extremely likely that the idea of monotheism at Thebes (&Armana) is from the Hebrews. It could even be possible that Akhenaten was the biblical Joseph which would account for his unique features (being Jewish). ...MAYBE...

    • @crescendyr8438
      @crescendyr8438 2 роки тому

      What unique features? What makes you think Israelites were malformed? They looked like the Kushites and Egyptians.

    • @leosrule5691
      @leosrule5691 2 роки тому

      @@crescendyr8438 elongated skull ua-cam.com/video/ryycDVWXDvc/v-deo.html Also, it is said by archeologists & historians, that they believe he was a hated pharaoh for abolishing the belief in many Gods (polytheism) for the belief in only a one true God (monotheism). He also moved the capital to Armana, presumably to take power away from the temple priests. In the Hebrew bible, the Hebrew Joseph becomes Pharaoh for about 30yrs. He protects the Israelites (Hebrews) during this time and, most likely, moves the capital to be nearer to his family. Therefore, I make the total assumption (based on historical fact mixed with biblical stories) to say that it is possible that Akhenaten was Joseph, the Hebrew. This assumption could account for the actual reason of hatred towards Akhenaten (rather than the held belief in a God war), because he was not actually Egyptian. It could account for the move of the capital. It could account for the difference in physical appearance from all other pharaoh's. And it could establish a more accurate timeline of the events in the Hebrew bible to an actual historical timeline. I'm not saying any of this is fact, I'm saying it 'could be'. Regardless of my theories, the mummy of Akhenaten as well as surviving carvings of him & his family, do show the strange skull shapes - aka: 'unique features'.

    • @crescendyr8438
      @crescendyr8438 2 роки тому

      @@leosrule5691 Joseph was not Pharaoh. He was like the Hand of the King in GoT. I was asking: Why do you believe his deformity is a sign of him being Hebrew? What makes you think Hebrews were deformed?

    • @leosrule5691
      @leosrule5691 2 роки тому

      @@crescendyr8438 my bad; ruler not Pharaoh. Gen 45: 8-9. And I don't think Hebrews had deformity, I only know that there are skeletons found to have this deformity (elongated skull). And since the Hebrews were not native to Egypt (but we're immigrants), it is POSSIBLE that they had a different shaped head. Just as anthropologists can look at a skeleton and are able to tell what race they were just by the nasal and cheek bones. And this is without skin (color) and cartilage (shaping the end of a nose). Anyway, I mention possibilities, not absolutes. There is no need to get offended by an innocent thought for possibility and there was no slur or disparity made by me. If you found it so, it was only by the workings of your own mind.

    • @crescendyr8438
      @crescendyr8438 2 роки тому

      @@leosrule5691 They don't. Israelite skull remains have been recovered from the site of tel Iachish ( 2 Chronicles 32.9; 2 Kings 18.13-14). There are Assyrian reliefs depicting this seige and in those reliefs you see severed heads of the Israelites. Those remains were found and the skulls were said to be like that of Egyptians. Basically like black east Africans. A traditional African horizonally elongated skull and prognasticism, with a narrow nasal cavity. Like Beja, Oromo or Afar people. I never took any offense. I'm not sure what made you think I did. I'm just asking because the deformities in question are quite severe with the "ancient alien" skull shapes and all.

  • @dermotmccorkell663
    @dermotmccorkell663 3 роки тому

    Dating can't be relied upon. Regardless when atenism was crushed like always an element of religious belief will endure. Atenists would have become second class and even slaves given time. Akenaten created the Jews.

    • @AkakaDomenjer
      @AkakaDomenjer 2 роки тому

      Akhenaten is Yahweh.

    • @dermotmccorkell663
      @dermotmccorkell663 2 роки тому

      @@AkakaDomenjer ish yes. The seed of monotheism and progenitor of the hebrews. It all fits but most theory is a best guess that known facts bare out.

  • @baldeagle77
    @baldeagle77 3 роки тому

    Thank you.

  • @RM-pb2vi
    @RM-pb2vi 3 роки тому

    great overview - eloquent, detailed & accessible

  • @-.George.
    @-.George. 3 роки тому

    Shasu is Jesus

  • @connercunha4262
    @connercunha4262 3 роки тому

    I’ll p op so wjjiiikii is